THE COLOR OF CLINICAL TRIALS: A TIMELINE BASED ON PHARMACEUTICAL ETHICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21576/pensaracadmico.2025v23i3.4465Abstract
The weight of the black community in the expansion of new health technologies is considered unequal and inferior in comparison to the weight of the white population's participation. This study orders a reflective process of the place where the black population is inserted in pharmaceutical ethical guidelines in the context of clinical trials today, in contrast to past eras. According to the bibliographies used in this article, participation is compromised even in pathological situations in which the black community may be the most affected. It is therefore necessary to ensure that the black community is included in ethical-social trials and to develop anti-racist strategies to occupy a space that is still little observed in the participatory context and in the contribution of ethnic-social diversity in innovative public health technologies, as well as bringing historical facts to the present day to reflect on how circumstances in the past were shaped based on outdated scientific etymologies that were thought up according to the strands of racism and its faces. This racism brings to light a situation based on ethnic hierarchy, which places the white community in a position of privilege and the black community in a position of subalternity. This literature review also portrays the most emblematic historical facts about the use of the black population for scientific advances in the past, how these events affect the population and sculpt scientific racism, and brings up possible measures that the pharmaceutical industries, institutes and organizations that promote clinical trials can put into action in order to guarantee an ethnically diverse representation in clinical trials for the development of new health technologies.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pensar Acadêmico

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam na Revista Pensar Acadêmico concordam com os seguintes termos:- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado simultaneamente sob uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution por 2 anos após a publicação, permitindo o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal), já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).